And in direct response to the author's claims regarding patents: most innovations today involve software, which is not protected by patents. A thoroughly researched analysis would be much more useful than a fluffy thought piece that relies on anecdotes and nostalgic reminiscences of a time when more children were being kidnapped and reported missing because they were allowed to "roam free.
Sir, I personally think there are some leaps here. Urbanization can be attributed to less drivers liscenses, as wel as strong public transit. Entrepreneurial levels in the traditional sense of physical business may be less but millenials have also turned YouTube videos, blogs, and personal property in to revenue generating schemes.
Not a traditional business but still signdicantly entrepreneurial. Lastly, I agree dependency does create vulnerabilities. But dependency also creates robustness, and reduancy because we understand the importantance of the communication systems. I would argue it's signdicantly more difficult than a single EMP burst to bring down an entire communications structure like the one our military possesses at least to the point where it would be an even playing field.
I agree there are vulnerabilities, but this generation are showing signs of advancement never seen before at the same time. For a short piece, I think that the writer presents his case well. It points to the importance of teaching our soldiers how to operate without all the amenities of modern life. I agree with the author that this is a situation worth considering. I know there are situations discussed amongst our First Responders throughout the country regarding a sudden loss of technology, but closing our eyes and saying something is a strength might not necessarily make it so. I agree with Cory that more research ought to be conducted, but I would recommend it should be aimed for a purpose.
What would our populace do in a situation where technology were taken away? This strikes me, even from a generation beyond the author, as a bit of a cheap shot without much to back it up. By this logic, the Cold War-era, motor savvy troops would be road-bound and completely unable to maneuver without motorized transport and the attendant logistics tail.
History shows better. While today's troops take full advantage of technologies we considered science fiction "back in the day", they're capable of functioning without it…sometimes more capable than their commanders, who've become used to a steady stream of information back, and often can't resist sticking their own oar into the tactical water. Mission command, indeed! Moreover, I've seen plenty of innovation, whether it's new applications for existing software, or new ways of "repurposing" existing tools.
Subscribe to NG Articles
All the economic data — small business owners, numbers of patents, etc — may be as reflective of the general U. I worry less about them than about some of my contemporaries, who are supposed to be leading them. To get to the point of the author study the Russian Ukrainian Crimean war. The Russians used cell phone emittions to target and destroy Ukrainian forces.
When younger members of the US military believe it to be their god given right to use their cell phones unrestricted, there is an issue. I do not believe there is an attempt to take away from the millennial generation what they have contributed but to highlight a very troubling issue based on current military tactics of enemy forces.
A simple test, put away the phone and navigate from Atlanta, GA to NYC, NY or any city or town without using interstate highways except in areas where it is the only means of travel. No electronics!!! How will you manage? What do you use? Uh, use a map? Just like we did in Ranger, Afghanistan, assorted training, and deployments, etc?
Culture of Abundance
Or we could use a compass, or use elementary school geography and just generally drive northeast — it's going to take a hot minute if you want to stay off large roads, but it isn't really hard. You could even — gasp — ask for directions, print out directions somewhere on the way, etc. Kinda lazy to freak out about 'young kids these days' but forget that 'millennials' includes not just LTs and PVTs, but some people almost at mil retirement.
There's valid reasons to bring up the dangers in really on tech in Ukraine-like fights- but other than a couple raids, you won't win those by ditching all electronics and trying to go back in history.
Culture of Abundance | Boundless US History
The other side is loaded down with electronics too — there are great opportunities for us to use that against them as long as we have the skills. A thought provoking discussion — nice to hear different view points with specific points to discuss to analyze the pertinent matter deeply. Um… I'm sorry but this is not ok.
- Chinas Environment and Chinas Environment Journalists: A Study.
- Debts in Abundance.
- Navigation menu!
- Introduction to Computational Mass Transfer: With Applications to Chemical Engineering!
Millenialls grew up in a complete different time. Our factors surrounding our upbringing are not the same. The wheels have already been built and millenials now need to come up with new ways to make money. Many don't want to join the military because 1. War doesn't solve anything. Trump is president. The military treats its enlisted poorly.
Also, not every millenial has an iphone.
- The Post-War Boom!
- San Francisco's Abundant Developable Land Supply | kihypehijify.tk.
- Abundance | National Museum of American History?
- Economic history of the United States - Wikipedia;
- Donate Button!
You fail to discuss socioeconomic factors. There is a very big divide financially between most millenials of color and white millenials with a few exceptions. Millenials have to struggle with how expensive everything is and not enough companies willing to take in a graduated student with no experience. Speak for yourself. I'm a Millennial and served 8 years in the Army, I rarely felt like I wasn't treated fairly.
Native American Cultures
I may not agree or fully understand the wars we are in. But I never regret the time I spent serving our country. And yes, unfortunately, wars do solve things. So, why don't we consider for a moment what ML blindly assumes as a "weakness" to be a further "strength" and consider the opportunities that exist in capitalizing on this generation's differences, put protections in place that reduce these vulnerabilities through our doctrine, education, equipping, and training , and actually take advantage of "what could be" in what right now is the future unknown…novelty…innovation…adaptive creativity.
If we plan to get ahead of the "near peer" and "peer" competitors, we must recognize the holistic picture of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, ours and theirs and capitalize on the areas of dissymmetry. It boggles my mind as to why we are looking at our "near peers" and attempting to strengthen the places they have caught up over the past 15 years…we need to be innovative and find the "blind spots" that exist; because they inherently do…if one thing is a strength, there must be some created weakness as well, which may be what MAJ Cavanaugh is getting at in our own military population, but we should be maybe we aren't though?
Do we continue to find ourselves in denial? Constantly fighting away from what is unknown because of the uncertainty that lies within?
I fully hear the message ML is sending, which is "know ourselves," and maybe there is something to this if we are being ignorant to the fast-paced changes that are going on within our own force and society , but I would offer many of us are aware of these vast changes, and merely trying to figure out the best way to take advantage of the change in tides. And I whole-heartedly agree that we senior generations must figure out more importantly how to harness the power of this change, and LEAD in way that bridges history and experience with innovation and creativity.
Maybe we just need to be less risk-averse, and more experimenting in our methodologies; in our training; in our exercises…we need to truly become a learning organization, instead of just saying we are, yet falling back on "old faithful" to resist embracing novelty and change. The author's point seems to bring the issue out for intelligent discussion, not to be praised or shot down as BS by patriots riding that horse to death. This is a clear case of the author not understanding the "sandwich method" of criticism. Nothing but fuss and no solution to contribute.
No state championship winning team of graduating seniors thinks the incoming freshmen will repeat their accomplishments. Do you think there is a way we could turn this potential weakness into a strength?
If millennials are so accustomed to carrying a means of communication with them at all times, perhaps we could use this to transmit more information, faster. I'm not suggesting we use private cell phones for operations, but I do believe millennials adapt to using new technology more quickly than previous generations. Millennial is a term used for demographics and it means anyone born from to around Please hold for a moment as the Millennials self-identifying as Generation X scramble to fact check and then return.
Not wanting to identify as Millennial makes sense, they are to blame for everything, especially destroying our military because they are weak, self-entitled, and unwilling to serve. Being an avocado muncher myself, I got pretty emotional over this and did what we Millennials do best, I turned to the internet for comfort. This is what I found. The very first Millennial joined the military in None of this makes sense because we know Millennials are undisciplined and must be catered to; this was all anecdotal anyways it does not prove anything.
There was research proving Millennials are bad for our Armed Forces. The US military only has 1. Quick search: search for products or web pages, depending on options selected below. Products Site. Michigan Publishing University of Michigan Press. The story of Americans' relation to land, how it has changed in the face of diminishing resources, and what the future may hold. Description Thomas Malthus once said, "The happiness of the Americans depended much less upon their peculiar degree of civilization than.
Visit Anne Mackin's website. Our relationship to the earth beneath our feet—how we dig it, buy it, sell it, zone it, pave it, spoil it or pamper it—helps explain what is produced on top of the land in our nation, from farms to homes to skyscrapers. All in all, Mackin takes us on a novel and erudite journey, from one coast to the other, and from Colonial times to the present.
Americans and Their Land
This valuable book marks a significant and lasting contribution to the way we see and understand our landscape and ourselves. All rights reserved. Michigan One-Room Schoolhouses. Flaubert's Landscape Descriptions. DOI: Except where otherwise noted, this work is subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 3.